Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns

Home | Contact us | Search
Our mission | MOGC publications | Staff members | Advisory committees | Our partners | Contact us
Africa | Asia | Middle East | Latin America | United Nations |
War is not the answer | Arms control/proliferation | U.S. military programs/policies | Security | Alternatives to violence
Maryknoll Land Ethic Process | Climate change | GMOs | Water | U.S. energy policy | Earth Charter |
Trade/Investment | Foreign debt | Millennium Devel. Goals | Corporate accountability | Int'l financial institutions | Work | Economic alternatives
Indigenous peoples | Migrants | Children | Women | People with HIV/AIDS
Educational resources | Sample letters | Contact policymakers | Links | MOGC publications |
Subscribe | Get a free copy | NewsNotes archive
 

Scientists acknowledge that climate change includes the melting of both polar caps, which have re-directed ocean channels that used to circulate warm and cold waters globally; this has caused stagnation and ocean warming which in turn has generated violent storms and “natural” disasters. This cycle of weather has been and continues to be generated and exacerbated by human activity. The only way to decelerate this progressive cycle is to set up binding regulations that will stop fueling the engines of climate change; in other words everyone must do all that is humanly possible to avert a global catastrophe and turn things around.

Climate change always will be connected with Kyoto, Japan, where the nations of the world gathered in 1997 to sign a convention that sets guidelines for humankind to stop global warming, the process that has disastrously affected so many people in so many areas of our world. At this United Nations’ Conference, the Island States of the Pacific made an urgent appeal to the world: Set up a strong course of action; make guidelines that are binding or our people will soon have to flee the rising waters of the Ocean; act now or whole cultures will be lost forever. Instead of responding to the global common good, six nations successfully made the whole process a scheme to protect state, private and global oil/auto interests.

The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16, 2005 -- the ninetieth day after at least 55 Parties to the Convention had ratified the document.

Fortunately at the Montreal Conference on Climate Change, held November 28-December 9, 2005, nations and NGOs worked together to make this document an instrument of real change. Even there it was reported: national self-interest appeared to trump determination to cut emissions of greenhouse gases that are warming the atmosphere, even as fresh scientific evidence poured in of the likely calamitous consequences .

What generated this turn around was: …a big jolt came when a major research journal published the first direct measurements indicating a slowdown in the vital currents that whisk vast amounts of heat around the Atlantic Ocean. Scientists have long predicted climate change would disrupt this "conveyor belt.”

Someone hopefully suggested that this is " a set of agreements that may well save the planet . ” On the other hand, a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said, "There doesn't seem to be any understanding that time is running out.” This leaves the world suspended between the common good and national self-interest, only the outcome will be global and will decide the future of the planet and all living beings.

See also:

Links

Food and Water Watch

The Kyoto Protocol

Pew Center on Global Climate Change

GreenFacts.org’s page on climate change

UN Environment Network’s page on climate change

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

About Us | Privacy Policy | Legal  |  Contact Us
© 2005 Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns